Review: ‘Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor’

There was a lot riding on the series finale of Doctor Who this year, because beyond the end of a season the episode would be the lead-in to the much anticipated 50th anniversary episode this November.

So when it was announced that the episode would be titled ‘The Name of the Doctor’ I wasn’t the only worried about where the episode would wind up taking us, especially since they also told us that Clara would find out the Doctor’s biggest secret.

“The Doctor has a secret he will take to the grave – it has been discovered.”

The line that is repeated several times throughout the episode and, at first glance, I believed the secret was the key to that sentence. But in the end it’s the Doctor’s grave that has been discovered, and to save Jenny, Strax and Madame Vastra he has to break into his own tomb. On Trenzalore.

Trenzalore, if you can recall, has been mentioned before – most notably during ‘The Wedding of River Song’ by Dorian who said: “On the fields of Trenzalore, at the fall of the Eleventh, when no creature can speak falsely or fail to answer, a question will be asked – a question that must never be answered: Doctor Who?”

With Clara in tow, and hoping to save his three friends, the Doctor comes face-to-face with The Great Intelligence again before the villain steps into the Doctors’ time-stream, intent on killing all incarnations of the Gallifreyan.

I won’t spoil the rest – though it’s likely obvious – but I will say that we once again see Alex Kingston’s River Song in the episode and she finally gets her closure, a chance to say goodbye to the man who loves her. The moment is touching, and painful, and I’m not ashamed to say I cried.

But it’s the ending that got me – with the Doctor entering his time-stream to save Clara he accidentally reveals his biggest secret: The Doctor who wasn’t. The incarnation who betrayed the name ‘Doctor’ – broke its promise.

Portrayed by John Hurt, the character may be The Valeyard – at least that’s my guess, but let’s not forget that Moffat does Moffat-y things, so it may well not be either. Some speculation is raising an interesting possibility that Hurt’s character is a ‘forgotten’ Doctor between the eighth and ninth regenerations, which is a route I frankly wouldn’t mind!

But for that story, we’re going to have to wait until November 23 – and it’s never felt further away.

But kudos to Moffat, this episode is easily my favourite from season 7b, and kept as much hidden as it revealed – succeeding in the goal to build the anticipation before the 50th.

I’d also like to say that, hot on the heels of this spectacular episode, Moffat and the BBC have confirmed that we’ll be getting a season 8. So, good news all around!

About these ads

3 thoughts on “Review: ‘Doctor Who: The Name of the Doctor’

  1. Marg: I am not a rabid Who fan, but I have loved David Tennant’s and Matt Smith’s versions (Eccelston too, come to think of it). Anyway, I’m not really up on the press. Has it been announced that this was Matt Smith’s last season? I found that ending a tad confusing, I’m afraid. But I was tired Saturday evening–bleary-eyed–so I probably ought to watch again. Anyway, your insights will be greatly appreciated! :-) mbf

    • Hi MB. Matt Smith has said that he’ll be returning next year for his fourth, and likely last, season as the Doctor after the big 50th anniversary episode. The ending, as in the introduction to that new character, is a bit confusing – I watched it twice before being able to sort out who I though he was. The general consensus is that John Hurt is either The Valeyard, or an incarnation of the Doctor between his eighth and ninth regenerations.

      Of course, just because that’s what the fans think is going to happen doesn’t mean that Moffat isn’t pulling a fast one on us again

      I know you mentioned that you’re relatively new to Who, so here’s a WhoWiki that can be of some use: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Doctor_Who_Wiki

      Hope I helped!

      • Thanks, Marg, for the info. It’s helpful!

        [?] MB On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Marg’s Meanderings wrote:

        > ** > margsheridan commented: “Hi MB. Matt Smith has said that hell be > returning next year for his fourth, and likely last, season as the Doctor > after the big 50th anniversary episode. The ending, as in the introduction > to that new character, is a bit confusing I watched it twic” >

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s